News
Kim Carnes appeared to subtly shade JoJo Siwa's 'Bette Davis Eyes' cover after the pop star teased it via social media ...
The original artist behind the 1981 hit “Bette Davis Eyes” seemingly had something to say about JoJo Siwa’s cover in a ...
The 22-year-old singer, actor and YouTube superstar has also performed the song on tour this year, notably changing the ...
Kim Carnes is explaining how she really feels about JoJo Siwa's cover of her hit song, "Bette Davis Eyes" ... and only TMZ has her full statement. Kim tells TMZ ... "When I first saw my original ...
JoJo Siwa released a polarizing cover of Kim Carnes' 1981 hit "Bette Davis Eyes." The original singer appeared to shade the ...
16h
The Mirror US on MSNBette Davis Eyes singer Kim Carnes breaks silence after deleting shady comment about JoJo SiwaHate of JoJo Siwa's latest cover of Bette Davis Eyes was only amplified as the original singer of the song interjected with her thoughts. She wants to protect its legacy ...
4d
E! News on MSNJoJo Siwa Seemingly Shaded by Original "Bette Davis Eyes” Singer Kim Carnes After Song Cover"Bette Davis Eyes" singer Kim Carnes appeared to subtly diss JoJo Siwa after the Celebrity Big Brother UK alum recorded a cover of the 1981 hit.
Kim Carnes has reacted to JoJo Siwa ‘s cover of ‘Bette Davis Eyes’. Siwa released her version of the hit on Friday (July 11), after covering it at multiple live shows this year. Now, Carnes – who ...
JoJo has since spoken out and her boyfriend, Chris Hughes, has defended the cover. Now, Kim Carnes appears to have revealed what she thinks about JoJo's rendition of her iconic 80s anthem in a ...
As per a recent article by Us Weekly, JoJo Siwa's cover of Bette Davis Eyes is making rounds on social media. Kim Carnes, who ...
JoJo Siwa has put her own spin on Kim Carnes’ song “Bette Davis Eyes,” and the internet has a lot to say about it. On July 10 ...
The Grammy-winning singer posts and deletes a TikTok post appearing to shade JoJo Siwa’s viral cover performance.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results