Recently, acting NASA Administrator Sean Duffy reportedly suggested a U.S. reactor would be operational on the moon by 2030.

Nuclear energy stocks have been all the rage recently. Demonstrating this is the return of the VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF ...

Placing an atomic energy source on the lunar surface is “not science fiction,” experts say, but does pose technical ...

The first space race was about flags and footprints. Now, decades later, landing on the Moon is old news. The new race is to ...

NASA plans to establish a continuous lunar presence by 2030 with a nuclear reactor, crucial for powering habitats and ...

A lunar nuclear reactor may sound dramatic, but its neither illegal nor unprecedented. But it does raise critical questions ...

The Superpowers of world politics, the United States of America (USA), China, and Russia, are in a race already generating ...

Accelerated plans announced by NASA this month for the United States to put a nuclear reactor on the moon ahead of its geopolitical rivals would break new ground - not just on the lunar surface, but ...

The Moon’s first nuclear reactor will be more than an engineering feat — it will be a test case for powering Mars missions ...

The project aims to create a reliable energy source for future moon bases, enabling extended human habitation and supporting advanced research far from Earth.

Fast-tracking a Nasa plan to build a nuclear reactor on the moon may sound dubious. Experts say that’s because it is.